SAFe Scrum Master

The correct answer to your question is:

Team members are pulling in work from future Iterations

Explanation

In the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, an anti-pattern that indicates a team is overcommitting to work is when team members start pulling in work from future iterations. This is a clear sign that the team is taking on more work than they can handle in the current iteration.

Here's a brief explanation of why the other options are not correct:

• Flow time is decreasing: This could indicate that the team is becoming more efficient, not necessarily that they are overcommitting.
• Capacity and load are exactly the same: This is actually a good thing. It means that the team's workload matches their capacity, which is the goal in agile methodologies.
• Team velocity increases over time: This could also indicate that the team is becoming more efficient. However, if the increase is too rapid, it could be a sign of overcommitment, but it's not as clear an indicator as pulling in work from future iterations.

One of the high-performing team characteristics that Team A is demonstrating is using regular feedback loops built into the learning cycle. A high-performing Agile Team is a cross-functional group of people that have everything, and everyone, necessary to produce a working, tested increment of product. They are empowered, collaborative, aligned, and committed to delivering value to the customers and the organization. One of the factors that enable a high-performing Agile Team is using regular feedback loops to learn and improve. Feedback loops are mechanisms that provide the team with information about the outcomes and impacts of their actions, as well as the needs and expectations of their customers and stakeholders. Feedback loops help the team to validate their assumptions, measure their progress, and adjust their plans accordingly. Feedback loops also help the team to foster a culture of experimentation, innovation, and continuous improvement, as well as to increase customer satisfaction and loyalty. Team A is using regular feedback loops by releasing the functionality with a method for collecting direct customer feedback. This allows them to learn from the actual users of their product, and to incorporate their feedback into the next iteration of development. This way, they can deliver value faster and more effectively, as well as to enhance the quality and usability of their product

(Must be taken from SAFe 6 Scrum Master resources)

One of the recommended practices for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches when facilitating Iteration Review is to begin to consider how and what to demo in Iteration Planning. This helps the team to have a clear vision of the expected outcome and to align their work with the iteration goals. It also facilitates the preparation and execution of the demo, as the team can anticipate the feedback and questions from the stakeholders. (Must be taken from SAFe 6 Scrum Master resources)

One way to ensure a team is holding successful iteration reviews and demos is to have the team
demo working, tested system components that meet the definition of done (DoD). This shows the
team’s progress and value delivery, and allows them to receive feedback from the product owner
and other stakeholders. The team should minimize the use of slides and the preparation time for the
demos, and focus on the solution instead of the presentation.

According to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, the common anti-pattern for teams trying to prepare their draft objectives at PI planning is:

Too much time is spent analyzing each Story

This is considered an anti-pattern because it can lead to analysis paralysis, where the team spends so much time trying to understand every detail of each story that they lose sight of the bigger picture and delay the planning process. The focus during PI planning should be on understanding the high-level objectives and how the team can work together to achieve them, rather than getting bogged down in the details of individual stories.

Remember, the goal of PI planning is to align the team on the objectives for the upcoming Program Increment and to create a plan to achieve those objectives. It's important to strike a balance between understanding the details of the work and maintaining a focus on the overall objectives.

According to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, servant leaders can encourage team member personal growth in several ways. However, based on the options provided, the most appropriate method would be:

Pair team members together to complete new or unique work

This approach is in line with the SAFe principle of fostering a learning culture. By pairing team members together, they can learn from each other, share knowledge, and develop new skills. This not only promotes personal growth but also enhances team performance and productivity.

Here's a brief explanation of why the other options are less suitable:

• Encourage team members to complete more work within areas in which they are comfortable: This approach may not necessarily promote personal growth as it does not challenge team members to learn new skills or step out of their comfort zones.
• Assign development paths to team members based on their current skills: While this can help team members improve their existing skills, it may not encourage them to learn new ones, limiting their personal growth.
• Encourage spending more time in their role over formal learning: This approach may lead to stagnation and limit personal growth as it does not provide opportunities for team members to learn new skills or gain new knowledge.

According to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration is a special iteration dedicated to innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and infrastructure work. It's also a time for teams to rest and prepare for the next Program Increment (PI).

If Team A decides to continue with their feature delivery work during the IP Iteration, they could potentially experience all of the effects listed in the options. However, the most significant effect would be:

They could lose an opportunity to manage risks and communication within the Agile Release Train (ART)

This is because the IP Iteration is a crucial time for teams to reflect on their work, identify and manage risks, and improve communication within the ART. By continuing with their feature delivery work, Team A might miss out on these opportunities, which could negatively impact their performance in the next PI.

Here's a table summarizing the potential effects:

One anti-pattern of the Inspect and Adapt (I&A) is to have no actionable improvement Features
created as a result of the problem-solving workshop. This is considered an anti-pattern because the
main goal of the I&A workshop is to identify and address the systemic issues that are limiting the
effectiveness of the Agile Release Train (ART). The workshop should produce one or more
improvement Features that are added to the ART backlog and prioritized for the next PI Planning
event. These Features should be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-
bound) and aligned with the ART vision and goals. Without actionable improvement Features, the
ART will miss the opportunity to learn and improve from the feedback and data collected during the
PI.

Iteration Review - Scaled Agile Framework
Exam Study Guide: SSM (6.0) - SAFe® Scrum Master

The Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology identifies seven core competencies that are critical to achieving business agility. These competencies are:

1. Lean-Agile Leadership
2. Team and Technical Agility
3. Agile Product Delivery
4. Enterprise Solution Delivery
5. Lean Portfolio Management
6. Organizational Agility
7. Continuous Learning Culture

From the options you provided, Agile Product Delivery and Built-in Quality are recognized as core competencies in the SAFe 6.0 methodology.

Here is a brief explanation of these two competencies:

• Agile Product Delivery: This competency is about delivering valuable outcomes in a lean, reliable, and continuous flow. It involves three dimensions: Customer Centricity and Design Thinking, DevOps and Release on Demand, and Developing on Cadence and Releasing on Demand.
• Built-in Quality: This competency ensures that each solution element, at every increment, meets appropriate quality standards throughout development. It involves five specific aspects: Flow, Architecture and Design Quality, Code Quality, System Quality, and Release Quality.

The other two options you provided, "Growth Mindset" and "Design Thinking Practices", are important aspects of the SAFe methodology, but they are not recognized as standalone core competencies. They are incorporated within other competencies. For example, Design Thinking is a part of the Agile Product Delivery competency, and Growth Mindset is a part of the Continuous Learning Culture competency.

Openness is one of the Scrum Values that can help Agile Teams create transparency. Being open involves sharing information, feedback, and concerns openly within the team and with stakeholders. It fosters an environment where everyone feels comfortable expressing their thoughts and ideas, leading to better collaboration and decision-making. Openness promotes transparency by ensuring that relevant information is readily available to all team members, allowing for a clear understanding of the work being done and the challenges being faced.

In the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe), teams are typically advised to maintain a backlog with enough refined Stories to cover approximately 2-3 weeks of work. This allows for a manageable scope of work that the team can commit to completing within a reasonable timeframe, promoting agility and flexibility in responding to changing priorities and customer needs.

Hackathons are one of the activities that can be done during the IP Iteration to foster innovation and learning. They allow the team members to work on whatever they want, with whomever they want, as long as the work reflects the mission of the company. The teams then demo their work to others at the end of the hackathon. Hackathons can help the team explore new ideas, technologies, and solutions that can benefit the business and the customers. They can also increase the team's engagement, creativity, and collaboration.

Reference: Innovation and Planning Iteration - Scaled Agile Framework,Exam Study Guide: SSM (6.0) - SAFe Scrum Master

One way a Scrum Master/Team Coach can support productive team Backlog Refinement sessions is to ensure subject matter experts are invited. Subject matter experts (SMEs) are people who have specialized knowledge or skills related to the domain or technical aspects of the product or solution. They can provide valuable input and feedback to the team during Backlog Refinement, such as clarifying requirements, validating assumptions, identifying dependencies, and suggesting solutions. SMEs can also help the team to split, estimate, and prioritize the backlog items more effectively and accurately. By inviting SMEs to the Backlog Refinement sessions, the Scrum Master/Team Coach can facilitate better collaboration, communication, and alignment among the team and the stakeholders. (Must be taken from SAFe 6 Scrum Master resources)

The team aligns on the progress of Iteration Goals

Explanation

In the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, the Team Sync event is a crucial part of the Agile Release Train (ART). It is a daily meeting where team members synchronize their work and progress towards the Iteration Goals.

The main objectives of the Team Sync event are:

• To align the team on what was done the previous day
• To plan the work for the current day
• To identify any obstacles or impediments that might hinder progress

The other options provided are related to different events in the SAFe methodology:

• "The team is able to prepare requirements for Iteration Planning" - This is related to the Pre-Iteration Planning phase.
• "The team is able to commit to a set of goals to be delivered in the Iteration" - This is the outcome of the Iteration Planning event.
• "The team reviews and improves processes before the next Iteration" - This is the purpose of the Iteration Retrospective event.

According to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, all four characteristics mentioned are crucial for a high-performing team. However, in the context of your question, where two developers have different ideas on how to implement a solution, the most relevant characteristic would be Healthy Conflict.

Explanation

• Healthy Conflict: This is a key characteristic of high-performing teams. It allows for the open discussion of ideas, where each team member feels comfortable expressing their thoughts and opinions. In this scenario, the two developers can engage in a constructive debate about their differing ideas, which can lead to a more robust and well-thought-out solution.

Here's a brief overview of how the other characteristics contribute to a high-performing team:

• Mutual Trust: This is the foundation of any team. It allows team members to feel safe in expressing their ideas and opinions, knowing that they will be respected and considered.
• Effective Decision-Making: This characteristic ensures that decisions are made in a timely and efficient manner, with the input of all team members. It's crucial for moving projects forward and avoiding stagnation.
• Clear Goals and Purpose: Having a clear understanding of the team's goals and purpose helps to align all team members and keeps everyone focused on the same objectives.

The ART Planning Board highlights the new Feature delivery dates, Feature dependencies among Teams and relevant

According to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, the organizing attribute that teams share with the other teams on their Agile Release Train (ART) is:

Synchronization to a common cadence

This is a key principle of SAFe. All teams on an ART align to a common iteration length and schedule, which is typically 10-12 weeks. This synchronization allows for better planning, coordination, and predictability across the ART.

Here's a brief explanation of the other options:

• Simultaneous release in one pipeline: While it's true that teams on an ART aim to release together, this is not an organizing attribute. It's more of a result of the synchronization and coordination efforts.
• Facilitation techniques amongst all meetings: Facilitation techniques can vary from team to team and are not necessarily shared across all teams on an ART.
• Prioritization across all backlogs: Prioritization is done at the team level, based on the Program Increment (PI) objectives and the team's understanding of the work. While there is alignment and coordination at the ART level, each team maintains its own backlog and prioritizes its work independently.

The intended value of the Backlog Refinement event is that the team is able to prepare requirements for Iteration Planning. Backlog Refinement is an ongoing process where the team collaborates with the Product Owner and other stakeholders to review, split, prioritize, and estimate the stories in the Team Backlog. One of the main objectives of Backlog Refinement is to ensure that the stories are ready for Iteration Planning, which means they are clear, feasible, testable, and small enough to be completed in a single Iteration. By doing so, the team can improve the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their work, as well as deliver value to the customers and the organization.

One purpose of iteration goals is to align team members to a common purpose and vision. Iteration
goals are a high-level summary of the business and technical goals that an Agile Team agrees to
accomplish in an iteration. They help the team and the product owner to reach agreement on the
business value they intend to deliver, align their work to their team PI objectives, and ground
everyone on their shared purpose. Iteration goals also provide transparency and management
information, as well as support the coordination and dependency management of the Agile Release Train (ART).

According to the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) 6.0 methodology, all the options provided can be used by a Scrum Master or Team Coach to guide team members towards finding solutions together. However, the context and the specific problem at hand will determine the most suitable technique to use.

Here's a brief explanation of each technique:

Asking Powerful Questions

This technique involves the Scrum Master asking thought-provoking questions that encourage team members to think critically and come up with solutions. The questions should be open-ended and designed to stimulate creative thinking.

Pairing Team Members to Grow T-Shaped Skills

This technique involves pairing team members with different skill sets to work on tasks together. This not only promotes collaboration but also helps team members to broaden their skills and knowledge, hence the term "T-shaped skills".

Bringing in New Team Members to Refresh the Team Dynamic

Sometimes, introducing new team members can bring fresh perspectives and ideas, which can help in finding solutions. However, this should be done carefully to avoid disrupting the existing team dynamics.

Facilitating a Process Improvement Workshop

This involves organizing a workshop where team members can discuss their processes, identify areas of improvement, and come up with solutions to enhance their efficiency and productivity.